Sensible citizens understand that a comprehensive national energy policy will emphasize production, conservation, and innovation. The U.S. cannot drill or refine its way out of the energy crunch. It cannot conserve its way out, either. And it simply can't wait until an Edison discovers technological salvation in his basement. The prudent approach requires effort along all three fronts.

The other day Rep. Randy Forbes, R-4th, issued a challenge: His proposed New Manhattan Project for Energy Independence calls for a competition that would award monetary prizes to individuals or groups achieving any of seven energy goals.

The categories include (1) doubled fuel economy standards in affordable cars; (2) a 50-percent reduction in home and business energy use; (3) making solar power at the same cost as coal; (4) making biofuels cost-competitive with gasoline; (5) improved storage of carbon emissions from coal-fired plants; (6) efficient storage of nuclear waste; and (7) production of usable electricity from nuclear fusion.

Forbes seeks complete energy independence, which probably is not possible. A commitment to achieve independence, however, would have welcome consequences. The U.S. simply must reduce its reliance on energy sources that are not only uncertain but increasingly costly. The U.S. must exploit its own reserves; it must conserve; it must break its bad habits; it must boost energy alternatives; and, as Forbes' challenge suggests, it must tap its ingenuity and can-do spirit.